Jay-Z (born in 1969) didn’t romanticize the streets (Recruited lieutenants with ludicrous dreams of gettin’ cream/‘Let’s do this,’ it gets tedious), but he never claimed remorse for them either.The label sued its co-founder Damon Dash on June 18, alleging he was trying to sell virtual ownership of the “Reasonable Doubt” copyrights. Roc-A-Fella Records has convinced a New York federal judge Jay-Z’s first album shouldn’t be sold as an NFT, at least for the time being.By the time he released 1996’s Reasonable Doubt, he said he was the oldest 26-year-old you’d ever want to meet. Now , when it comes to real battle it pretty much comesDamon Dash on Where ‘Reasonable Doubt’ Lies in Legal Dispute With Jay-Z Over Debut Album (EXCLUSIVE) The Roc-A-Fella CEO and one-time partner to Jay-Z talks suing Hova, being sued by Hova. And here i feel Jay- Z has a upper hand as he has one of the greatest disstracks against one of his one teammates Nas. They are not made for confrontation , atleast when it comes to this case. Its pretty obvious that Jay-Z and Kendrick are the weakest ones on their respective teams.
This marks a new milestone in the history of NFT’s, entitling the new owner to future revenue generated by the unique asset.”Mystery Shrouds Sale of Beyonce, Jay-Z's Baroque New Orleans ChurchAn auction had been set for June 23-25, according to the complaint, but it was cancelled after Roc-A-Fella sent a warning letter to SuperFarm. While Dash has disputed that he was trying to sell rights in the album, according to the complaint, investor platform SuperFarm made this announcement: “SuperFarm is proud to announce, in collaboration with Damon Dash, the auction of Damon‘s ownership of the copyright to Jay-Z’s first album Reasonable Doubt. In honor of the 25th anniversary of ‘Reasonable Doubt,’ we’re counting down the best of Hov’s best, from his days with Jaz-O to the present.
...
Roc-A-Fella won’t have to put up a bond, but it will have to continue to fight as the parties will next debate whether the TRO becomes a preliminary injunction.
0 kommentar(er)
